MARK OF THE BEAST TECHNOLOGY
IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL ID APPROVED BY FDA
The Washington Post reports: "A microchip that can be implanted
under the skin to give doctors instant access to a patient's records
yesterday won government approval, a step that could transform medical care
but is raising alarm among privacy advocates.
The tiny electronic capsule, the first such device to receive Food and
Drug Administration approval, transmits a unique code to a scanner that
allows doctors to confirm a patient's identity and obtain detailed medical
information from an accompanying database.
Applied Digital Solutions Inc. of Delray Beach, Fla., plans to market the
VeriChip systems -- the chips, scanners and computerized database -- to
hospitals, doctors and patients as a way to improve care and avoid errors by
ensuring that doctors know whom they are treating and the patient's personal
health details.
Doctors would scan patients like cans of soup at a grocery store. Instead
of the price, the patient's medical record would pop up on a computer
screen. Emergency room doctors could scan unconscious car accident victims
to check their blood type and medications and make sure they have no drug
allergies. Surgeons could scan patients in the operating room to guard
against cutting into the wrong person. Chips could be implanted in
Alzheimer's patients in case they get lost.
'In hospitals today, many deaths occur because people aren't able to
communicate timely enough their medical information or because of wrong
information,' said Scott Silverman, the company's chief executive. 'With
VeriChip, you'll be able to have accurate information even if a patient
can't talk. It's a way to modernize our antiquated system of medical
records.'
The approval was immediately denounced by privacy advocates, who fear it
could endanger patient privacy and mark a dangerous step toward a Big
Brother future in which people will be tracked by the implants or required
to have them inserted for surveillance, identification and other purposes.
'Once the technology is out there and is available, it raises the very
real possibility that people in a position to require or demand it will
begin to do that,' said Katherine Albrecht, who has campaigned against such
devices. 'It would obviously be possible to inject one of these into
everyone. In the post-9/11 world, we are already racing down the path to
total surveillance. The only thing missing to clinch the deal has been the
technology. This may fill that gap.'..." (Imagine! Total surveillance.
Big Brother is on the way - Revelation 13:15-18)
FEDS PLAN TO TRACK EVERY CAR
WorldNetDaily.com reports: "A little-known federal agency is
planning a new monitoring program by which the government would track every
car on the road by using onboard transceivers.
The agency, the Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office,
is part of the Department of Transportation. According to an extensive
report in the Charlotte, N.C., Creative Loafing, the agency doesn't respond
to public inquiries about its activity.
According to the report, cutting-edge tracking technology will be used by
government transportation management centers to monitor every aspect of
transportation. Under the plan, not only will movement be monitored but it
also will be archived in massive databases for future use.
The paper reports a group of car manufacturers, technology companies and
government interests have worked toward implementing the project for 13
years.
States the Creative Loafing report:
'The only way for people to evade the national transportation tracking
system they're creating will be to travel on foot. Drive your car, and
your every movement could be recorded and archived. The federal government
will know the exact route you drove to work, how many times you braked
along the way, the precise moment you arrived - and that every other
Tuesday you opt to ride the bus.
'They'll know you're due for a transmission repair and that you've
neglected to fix the ever-widening crack that resulted from a pebble
dinging your windshield.'
The agency's website says its purpose is to 'use advanced technology to
improve the efficiency and safety of our nation's surface transportation
system.'..." (More on Big Brother - Revelation 14:9,11; 15:2; 19:20;
20:9)
RFID DRIVER'S LICENSES DEBATED
Wired.com reports: "Some federal and state government officials
want to make state driver's licenses harder to counterfeit or steal, by
adding computer chips that emit a radio signal bearing a license holder's
unique, personal information.
In Virginia, where several of the 9/11 hijackers obtained driver's
licenses, state legislators heard testimony about how radio frequency
identification, or RFID, tags may prevent identity fraud and help thwart
terrorists using falsified documents to move about the country.
Privacy advocates will argue that the radio tags will also make it easy
for the government to spy on its citizens and exacerbate identity theft, one
of the problems the technology is meant to relieve.
Virginia is among the first states to explore the idea of creating a
smart driver's license, which may eventually use any combination of RFID
tags and biometric data, such as fingerprints or retinal scans.
'Nine of the 19 9/11 terrorists obtained their licenses illegally in
Virginia, and that was quite an embarrassment,' said Virginia General
Assembly delegate Kathy Byron, chairwoman of a subcommittee looking into the
use of so-called smart driver's licenses, which may include RFID technology.
The biometric data would make it harder for an individual to use a stolen
or forged driver's license for identification. The RFID tags would make the
licenses a 'contact-less' technology, verifying IDs more efficiently, and
making lines at security checkpoints move quicker.
Because information on RFID tags can be picked up from many feet away,
licenses would not have to be put directly into a reader device. If there
was any suspicion that a person was not who he claimed to be, ID checkers
could take him aside for fingerprinting or a retinal scan.
States need to adopt technologies that can ensure a driver's license
holder is who he says he is, said Byron.
Federal legislators may also require states to comply with uniform 'smart
card' standards, making state driver's licenses into national identification
cards that could be read at any location throughout the country. The RFID
chips on driver's licenses would at a minimum transmit all of the
information on the front of a driver's license. They may also eventually
transmit fingerprint and other uniquely identifiable information to reader
devices..." (God sees everything everywhere - Jeremiah 16:17; 23:34;
Hebrews 4:13. The Antichrist [I John 2:28] will have to use technology to
track mankind during his reign. It's now with us. Christ's Return is near)
UK PRESSES ON WITH COMPULSORY ID CARD PLANS
Silicon.com reports: "The government will now issue standalone
compulsory biometric ID cards as part of changes to the draft ID card bill
issued by Home Secretary David Blunkett - despite growing public opposition
to the scheme.
The cards will be issued with passports but will not be incorporated into
either the existing passport or driving license as previously proposed, with
a standardized online verification service used to check card details
against those held on the National Identity Register (NIR).
The changes are part of the Home Office's response to a Parliamentary
Home Affairs select committee report by MPs in July, which broadly backed
the ID card scheme despite some major reservations and criticisms.
'I will now bring forward legislation to bring in a compulsory, national
ID card scheme,' said Blunkett in a statement.
A new executive agency incorporating the UK Passport Service and working
with the Home Office's Immigration and Nationality Directorate will now be
set up to deliver and run the ID card scheme.
But a summary of findings from the Home Office's consultation exercise
highlights the fact there are still serious concerns about the ID card
scheme from bodies ranging from privacy groups to the Confederation of
British Industry over the scope, security and management of the project.
The Law Society, for example, raises the question of whether it will
prove too costly to pursue individuals who incur a £2,500 fine for refusing
to register for the ID cards.
Initial government research into the public's views on ID cards found 79
per cent in favor or very much in favor of them, with only 13 per cent
against and eight per cent unsure. More recent research, however, included
in the consultation summary shows support has dropped significantly with
only 31 per cent now in favor, 48 per cent opposed and only eight per cent
supportive in principle even with reservations about the Bill..." (The
Mark will become global when the world's final dictator takes charge of the
masses of humanity - Revelation 13:1,7)
FINGERPRINTS REQUIRED IN NEW EU PASSPORTS
The EU Observer reports: "EU citizens will be obliged to have
their fingerprints in their passports in the future.
Member states agreed at a meeting in Luxembourg that a second biometric
identifier, fingerprints, must be included in all new passports and other
travel documents.
This follows a decision in June where member states decided that EU
passports must include facial images.
The aim is to make passports and other travel documents more secure and
establish a more reliable link between them and the holder.
The biometric data gathered will be stored on a 'chip' embedded in the
new passports, Personal details and the biometric data will be held on
national databases and on a EU-wide database of European Register for issued
passports - the latter will be on the Schengen Information System (SIS II)
and be accessible by law enforcement agencies, according to Statewatch.
While fingerprints will be obligatory in new passports 3 years after the
technical specifications are in place, facial images will be required 18
months after adoption of the regulation.
The UK, Denmark and Ireland have a 'legal exemption' in the EU treaties
regarding this area of judicial co-operation and are not bound to follow the
regulation.
Denmark - together with Germany - has however indicated that it intends
to start issuing biometrically enhanced passports from the end of 2005 in
order to comply with the requirements of the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) and the requirements of the US Visa Waiver legislation.
Finland and Austria have tabled technical reservations to the regulation,
but the problems are expected to be overcome.
Since 1 May, these type of decisions are subject to qualified majority
voting in the Council - in co-decision with the European Parliament.
The five biggest EU countries said in a statement at the end of talks
earlier this month that they hoped to introduce fingerprint measures for
passports issued in their countries from 2006..." (The European Union is
where the international numbering system begins - Daniel 7:7,8,20,23,24.
It's all so near. We are living in momentous days.)
CLOSE WINDOW